[personal profile] bemused_leftist
Palin isn't the first to apply the term 'blood libel' to political speech that accuses the opposition of, in effect, having blood on its hands. Here's a Democrat in 2006 saying that Rove (and the Bush administration) is practicing 'blood libel'.

What Rove is giving voice to here is nothing less than the new blood libel of our age: that those who oppose the Bush Administration's unconstitutional actions are opening the door to a new 9/11. The implication is clear: anyone who speaks up for the Constitution is working for the death of innocent Americans.
http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=542246

By Chris Floyd, the author of Burlesque: The Secret History of the Bush Regime.

Hm, I wondered if any GOP jumped on Floyd for stretching the meaning of the term 'blood libel', but a quick Google didn't find anything.

Date: 2011-01-13 04:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinker.livejournal.com
You're going to equate Sarah Palin and someone named Chris Floyd, who self-published a book on the Bush Administration at lulu.com ?!

Date: 2011-01-13 04:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bemused-leftist.livejournal.com
Is your point that no one criticized Floyd's use of 'blood libel' as a modern political term because no one ever heard of him? I'd think, if the usage was so terrible, some of Bush/Rove's supporters would have called him on it.

He seems to have written a bit more than that in 2006 and 2007, unless there was another Chris Floyd bashing Bush and the GOP.
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Chris+Floyd%22&hl=en&prmdo=1&tbs=cdr:1,cd_min:1/1/2006,cd_max:1/1/2008&prmd=ivnso&ei=fH8uTf2TKo6osQOf0KT5BA&start=30&sa=N

Date: 2011-01-13 04:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinker.livejournal.com
Some guy self publishes a book, and goes the rounds of writing guest columns to try to promote the self published book.

How does this compare to Sarah Palin, who has international name recognition?

Date: 2011-01-13 05:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bemused-leftist.livejournal.com
If 'blood libel' as a political term is so terrible, wouldn't SOMEONE have said something? Rove had many supporters.

Date: 2011-01-13 05:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinker.livejournal.com
*sigh*

Chris Floyd's use at least shows awareness of the history of the term. I suspect this is why there was essentially no reaction. Compare various uses of the word n*gger - Dr. Laura uses it differently than Ta-Nehisi Coates.

Date: 2011-01-13 06:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bemused-leftist.livejournal.com
What specific things did Floyd say that gave you that impression? He and Palin were both criticizing claims that one faction's behavior would lead to "blood on their hands."

Date: 2011-01-13 06:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinker.livejournal.com
Argh. Too many links ago. Evidently Chris Floyd used the term repeatedly.

Date: 2011-01-13 07:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bemused-leftist.livejournal.com
I had the impression it was his same piece about Rove and al Qaeda on the phone, just reprinted at several sites, which happens.

Maybe Floyd put 'quotes' around the word and Palin didn't? ;-)

Good night.

Profile

bemused_leftist

August 2012

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
192021222324 25
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 7th, 2025 09:29 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios