May. 10th, 2010

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/may/06/climate-science-open-letter
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 6 May 2010 19.00 BST

Open letter: Climate change and the integrity of science

[excerpts from] an open letter from 255 members of the US National Academy of Sciences in defence of climate research

[....] Many recent assaults on climate science and, more disturbingly, on climate scientists by climate change deniers, are typically driven by special interests or dogma, not by an honest effort to provide an alternative theory that credibly satisfies the evidence. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and other scientific assessments of climate change, which involve thousands of scientists producing massive and comprehensive reports, have, quite expectedly and normally, made some mistakes. When errors are pointed out, they are corrected.

But there is nothing remotely identified in the recent events that changes the fundamental conclusions about climate change:

(i) The planet is warming due to increased concentrations of heat-trapping gases in our atmosphere. A snowy winter in Washington does not alter this fact.

(ii) Most of the increase in the concentration of these gases over the last century is due to human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation.

(iii) Natural causes always play a role in changing Earth's climate, but are now being overwhelmed by human-induced changes.

(iv) Warming the planet will cause many other climatic patterns to change at speeds unprecedented in modern times, including increasing rates of sea-level rise and alterations in the hydrologic cycle. Rising concentrations of carbon dioxide are making the oceans more acidic.

(v) The combination of these complex climate changes threatens coastal communities and cities, our food and water supplies, marine and freshwater ecosystems, forests, high mountain environments, and far more.

[....] We urge our policymakers and the public to move forward immediately to address the causes of climate change, including the unrestrained burning of fossil fuels.
Gacked from Filkertom

Fascinating web applet by Paul Rademacher, which allows you to superimpose the Gulf Coast oil spill's cover area (as of 5/6/10) onto any city you'd like. According to this, if Ann Arbor was the central point of the spill, it would extend west to Jackson, south past Toledo, north almost to Flint, and east into Canada.
See it at http://paulrademacher.com/oilspill/

Profile

bemused_leftist

August 2012

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
192021222324 25
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 22nd, 2025 03:27 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios